[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

[William Blevins]

Still doesnt support it


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Mark A. Flacy <mflacy at verizon.net> wrote:

> On Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:22:18 AM William Blevins wrote:
> > 2432 definitely duplicates 1772.  The only difference is that 2432
> proposes
> > a (bad) solution to the problem.
> >
> > Both give the example:
> >
> > Java('build',
> >      [source1, source2],
> >      JAVASOURCEPATH='src')
> >
> >
> > And explain that "their" issue is that source1 and source2 build in
> > parallel with separate javac commands; this is easily fixable with a
> > FLATTEN call, but we still haven't asked the important question.  Is
> > this working as designed and the documentation needs to be updated to
> > reflect or is this a software failure?
> >
> >
> > V/R,
> >
> > William
>
> There will certainly be cases where you would want both directories to be
> compiled as a single unit.
>
> *Especially* if at least one of those directories contains autogenerated
> source that is created by an earlier build step.  (SCons didn't seem to
> support this the last time that I thought about using it for Java, but that
> could be a faulty memory of mine.)
>
> --
> Mark A. Flacy
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140712/04e1a799/attachment.html>