[meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites

Anne Black impactika at aol.com
Tue Feb 20 15:08:19 EST 2024


Yes John,
But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others.  So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected.  
Anne BlackIMPACTIKA.comimpactika at aol.com
 

    On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:  
 
 
  Hello, my best..

Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right?
Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. 

I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why.

 As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor.
Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). 

Regards, John Lutzon
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240220/13ed2310/attachment.htm>


More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list