[meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites

[John Lutzon]

Anne,
    Of course! 100%! But, again, before such analyses are completed to prove such, it's premature to assume foul play. Click "Recent Comments" on MPOD.

 John

> On 02/20/2024 3:08 PM EST Anne Black <impactika at aol.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes John,
> 
> But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected.
> 
> Anne Black
> IMPACTIKA.com
> impactika at aol.com
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hello, my best..
> 
> Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right?
> Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. 
> 
> I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why.
> 
> As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor.
> Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). 
> 
> Regards, John Lutzon
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list