[Scons-dev] tools and testing

Bill Deegan bill at baddogconsulting.com
Mon Apr 17 11:26:11 EDT 2017


Russel,

Seems like pieces of it (including a new Node type) should be unit testable.
Also, Can Dub pull from a local repository, or is there a stable, but small
web accessible repository?

-Bill

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

> SCons policy is no tests, no entry into the repository. In the main,
> this is a good thing. However, for the dub tool, it can only be tested
> by making access to the Dub repository. This is a very different
> scenario to the classic SCons tool which is testable entirely within a
> local sandbox without access to the Internet.
>
> Tools such as https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DownloadUnpack
> exist only on the wiki (perhaps another examnple to make a repository
> from?) and so there is no testing obligation.
>
> So does this mean dub has no chance of entry into the main repository?
> Obviously I can cope with the answer yes, but now is the time for
> discussion so as to inform future management of it and the evolution of
> the dmd, ldc, and gdc tools.
>
> --
> Russel.
> ============================================================
> =================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20170417/6be4440d/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list