[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

[Gary Oberbrunner]

Hi William; if you're talking about your addition
of test/Java/DerivedSourceTest.py, I don't see that in the latest source.
 If you submit it as a pull request I'll merge it though.


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> For 1771, my protoc builder changes aren't important.
>
> If my test patch made it into the scons trunk, then that is a good first
> start.  The test patch shows this as a derived source issue that works for
> any case that *.java files are created and then compiled as steps within
> scons.
>
> At the time, I didn't have a bitbucket account or understand the scons
> submission process.  Do you know if that test case patch in the comment
> made it into the scons code base?
>
> V/R,
> William
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2432 definitely duplicates 1772.  The only difference is that 2432
>> proposes a (bad) solution to the problem.
>>
>> Both give the example:
>>
>> Java('build',
>>      [source1, source2],
>>      JAVASOURCEPATH='src')
>>
>>
>> And explain that "their" issue is that source1 and source2 build in parallel with separate javac commands; this is easily fixable with a FLATTEN call, but we still haven't asked the important question.  Is this working as designed and the documentation needs to be updated to reflect or is this a software failure?
>>
>>
>> V/R,
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <
>> garyo at oberbrunner.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10.07.2014 02:37, William Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  *More duplicates (just looking at java issues atm):*
>>>>
>>>> 2432 – Duplicates 1772
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure about this one. Gary, can you have a short look please?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not a Java guy, but these two don't seem quite like dups.  However
>>> perhaps the JAVASOURCEPATH var used in 1772 could do what the OP in 2432
>>> wants (although it's not automatic, which 2432 is asking for).  I'll put a
>>> quick note about that in 2432.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>


-- 
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140712/7e8a8d29/attachment.html>