[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

[William Blevins]

For 1771, my protoc builder changes aren't important.

If my test patch made it into the scons trunk, then that is a good first
start.  The test patch shows this as a derived source issue that works for
any case that *.java files are created and then compiled as steps within
scons.

At the time, I didn't have a bitbucket account or understand the scons
submission process.  Do you know if that test case patch in the comment
made it into the scons code base?

V/R,
William


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2432 definitely duplicates 1772.  The only difference is that 2432
> proposes a (bad) solution to the problem.
>
> Both give the example:
>
> Java('build',
>      [source1, source2],
>      JAVASOURCEPATH='src')
>
>
> And explain that "their" issue is that source1 and source2 build in parallel with separate javac commands; this is easily fixable with a FLATTEN call, but we still haven't asked the important question.  Is this working as designed and the documentation needs to be updated to reflect or is this a software failure?
>
>
> V/R,
>
> William
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <garyo at oberbrunner.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.07.2014 02:37, William Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>  *More duplicates (just looking at java issues atm):*
>>>
>>> 2432 – Duplicates 1772
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about this one. Gary, can you have a short look please?
>>
>>
>> I'm not a Java guy, but these two don't seem quite like dups.  However
>> perhaps the JAVASOURCEPATH var used in 1772 could do what the OP in 2432
>> wants (although it's not automatic, which 2432 is asking for).  I'll put a
>> quick note about that in 2432.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140712/692bd58b/attachment.html>