[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

[Gary Oberbrunner]

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2432 definitely duplicates 1772.  The only difference is that 2432
> proposes a (bad) solution to the problem.
>
> Both give the example:
>
> Java('build',
>      [source1, source2],
>      JAVASOURCEPATH='src')
>
> And explain that "their" issue is that source1 and source2 build in parallel with separate javac commands; this is easily fixable with a FLATTEN call, but we still haven't asked the important question.  Is this working as designed and the documentation needs to be updated to reflect or is this a software failure?
>
> I see what you mean now, William.   I'm OK with marking as dup.  As for
your big question, again I'm not the right guy to say but my understanding
is javac works much better when all the .java files are passed on the same
invocation.

-- 
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140712/cab01262/attachment-0001.html>