[Scons-dev] Issues that can potentially be closed

William Blevins wblevins001 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 12 10:22:18 EDT 2014


2432 definitely duplicates 1772.  The only difference is that 2432 proposes
a (bad) solution to the problem.

Both give the example:

Java('build',
     [source1, source2],
     JAVASOURCEPATH='src')


And explain that "their" issue is that source1 and source2 build in
parallel with separate javac commands; this is easily fixable with a
FLATTEN call, but we still haven't asked the important question.  Is
this working as designed and the documentation needs to be updated to
reflect or is this a software failure?


V/R,

William





On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <garyo at oberbrunner.com>
wrote:

>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 10.07.2014 02:37, William Blevins wrote:
>>
>>  *More duplicates (just looking at java issues atm):*
>>
>> 2432 – Duplicates 1772
>>
>> I'm not sure about this one. Gary, can you have a short look please?
>
>
> I'm not a Java guy, but these two don't seem quite like dups.  However
> perhaps the JAVASOURCEPATH var used in 1772 could do what the OP in 2432
> wants (although it's not automatic, which 2432 is asking for).  I'll put a
> quick note about that in 2432.
>
>
> --
> Gary
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140712/80b8894f/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list