[Scons-dev] Is Tigris issue tracking actively used?

[Dirk Bächle]

Andrew,

On 07.07.2014 19:47, Andrew Featherstone wrote:
> I'm likewise, William, but I think that all users can add some value 
> by wandering through the open issue list and seeing if we can improve 
> things by clearing issues that are known to be resolved, testing old 
> issues against current versions of SCons, etc. Dirk, I've started 
> traipsing through the open bugs, looking for things I think already 
> are fixed, or verifying if issues are still present, and commenting 
> accordingly. At 4 issues a day it'd be 3 months before the open issues 
> list has boiled down to nothing, but hopefully just keeping a downward 
> trend on this for a period will feel worthwhile.
>
thanks so much for all the work you've done so far!

> The roadmap is a high-level thing, and doesn't explain for example 
> what triggered the 2.3.2 release, which I'm interested in understanding.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
> P.S. on the homepage the links to the individual mailing lists point 
> to the old Tigris ones. Can they point at the Mailman-based ones instead?
>

That's #2947 already. ;)

Dirk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140707/a02308b6/attachment.html>