[Scons-dev] please try latest default branch

Gary Oberbrunner garyo at oberbrunner.com
Thu Jan 9 08:55:04 EST 2014


I'm also getting some spurious rebuilds with 2.3.1 compared with 2.3.0.
Will dig into it. Dirk, I'm not sure if it's your patch or something else
that changed.


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:


> Hi Roberto,

>

>

> On 08.01.2014 22:52, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:

>

>

>

> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:49 PM, roberto de vecchi <

> roberto.devecchi at vi-grade.com> wrote:

>

>> Gary,

>>

>>

>>

>> I think that the problem I’m seeing is generated by the modification in

>> FS.py around line 3052:

>>

>> ...

>>

>> removing the reset of self.cwd things look much better and I can build

>> correctly with interactive mode. Just for your info we are running

>> exclusively with variantdir enabled and no source duplication.

>>

>>

>>

>> If you can confirm the small change makes sense, I’ll let some of our

>> developer test more in detail this configuration.

>>

>>

>> It makes sense to me, but Dirk will have to have a say.

>

>

> thanks a lot for testing the new version. Please continue with the reset

> of self.cwd commented out (or remove the whole line). If you find further

> issues, just let us know immediately.

>

>

> @Gary: Let's wait another day and see if Roberto finds more errors, then

> I'd prepare a pull request for removing the offending lines, okay? Trying

> to reproduce the failing build on our side and then working around it, is

> probably not a good idea so short before the release.

>

>

> Best regards,

>

> Dirk

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>

>



--
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140109/8115779e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list