[Scons-dev] Qt support

[Brady Johnson]

I am also in favor of incorporating a newer version of Qt into SCons. It
would be good to be backwards compatible with previous versions, if
possible. Or at the very least allow for multiple versions like: Qt5, Qt4,
Qt3, etc

Brady


On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <garyo at oberbrunner.com>wrote:


> I'm in favor of standardizing (i.e. importing into SCons) a more recent Qt

> tool.  Qt3 is pretty ancient now.

>

>

> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>wrote:

>

>> Currently the qt tool is Qt3 and worse than useless because it doesn't

>> say qt3 it says qt. Thanks to Dirk and co we have a qt4 tool that works,

>> but it is not standard even though the Qt3 only qt tool is. What about

>> Qt5?

>>

>> I am prompted to ask now as someone was asking me about SCons at ACCU

>> 2013 and the issue of Qt support arose.

>>

>> Thanks.

>>

>> --

>> Russel.

>>

>> =============================================================================

>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:

>> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net

>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk

>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Scons-dev mailing list

>> Scons-dev at scons.org

>> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>>

>>

>

>

> --

> Gary

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20130414/69a2bf53/attachment.htm>