[meteorite-list] ET Question

[Paul Kurimsky]

.-  - -.  .-.  .  .    .- -  ..  -  ….   .- - -   .-. !!!  

Paul Kurimsky
Sent from my iPhone
kd7qk at flash.net


> On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>  Hello,
> 
>       Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems 
> to
>   be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known location object -- Liberty Bell 7.
> 
>      So, to ET:
>                      If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered 
> would
>                 it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the
>                 added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows up here from out there it Is ET
>         I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature superconductor to land in my mailbox ---- mailbox will be for 
> sale.
> 
>    JL
> .---  .-..      ---  ..-  - 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list