[meteorite-list] Clarification

[John Lutzon]

Even the Idiot that I am -- cannot fathom this continuing (can't find the words)
oh yeah--Bull--shi-- !
To further clarify your clarification-- it is very clear to everyone that this ongoing
thread is clearly DONE. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Hupe via Meteorite-list" <>
To: "metlist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 9:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Clarification



In an attempt to be as clear as possible, I must clarify a statement I 
posted to the list on November 5th:

The statement below which was made during the debate that escalated into 
arguments, was not clearly articulated and could be taken as a single 
event, when in actuality, it was two:

************************************************************************
The complaint against you, on the other hand, about self-pairing a Black 
Beauty stone, which was never paid for according to the seller, resulted 
in a different outcome.

************************************************************************

The part that reads "which was never paid for according to the seller" 
was a qualifying statement in regards to the stone and not part of the 
original self-pairing complaint to the IMCA.  This information was 
conveyed to me at a later date.

The IMCA doesn't consider complaints about non-paying parties that 
default on agreements.

Adam
______________________________________________

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list