[meteorite-list] Clarification

[Adam Hupe]

In an attempt to be as clear as possible, I must clarify a statement I 
posted to the list on November 5th:

The statement below which was made during the debate that escalated into 
arguments, was not clearly articulated and could be taken as a single 
event, when in actuality, it was two:

************************************************************************
The complaint against you, on the other hand, about self-pairing a Black 
Beauty stone, which was never paid for according to the seller, resulted 
in a different outcome.

************************************************************************

The part that reads "which was never paid for according to the seller" 
was a qualifying statement in regards to the stone and not part of the 
original self-pairing complaint to the IMCA.  This information was 
conveyed to me at a later date.

The IMCA doesn't consider complaints about non-paying parties that 
default on agreements.

Adam