[meteorite-list] The Interest In Meteorites

Murray Paulson murray.paulson at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 14:40:18 EDT 2011


Hi Bob & list:

I will caution you on the possible loss of valuable data on the
resampling the photos to too small a size. We have seen as time goes
by, the available bandwidth and storage capacity increases, and the
300 x 250 images will be vaguely reminicent of the 320 x 240 videos
you skip over on Youtube. We don't need 5 Mb image files, but some
happy medium would be nice. Please don't resize the images to a less
than useful size.

I have looked at 300, 480, 640, 800 and 1024 pixel long dimension
images and 640 to 800 are the minimum I would resample things down to.
I thank the efforts to put up the EOM and it is a great reference.

Murray Paulson


On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, bcmeteorites <bcmeteorites at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I will also add that one of the features we built into the EoM is that when an image is
> submitted that it automatically is resized to not consume a large amount of band width; if
> someone posts an image that has not been resized (many are 5mb and larger) it is reduced to
> around 300 x 250 pixels to help with not only size of data base but also to allow picture to
> load faster when you select to view full size.
>
> Glad that everyone is enjoying the EoM and it is with all the images it is becoming a solid
> data base for visual reference.
> Thanks to everyone for some of their outstanding images they have shared.
>
> Best Regards,
> Bob Falls
> IMCA Board of Director #2413
> EoM Administrator
>



More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list