[meteorite-list] NWA 5363 UNGROUPED OR BRACHNITE
cdtucson at cox.net
cdtucson at cox.net
Sat Jul 24 21:34:45 EDT 2010
Anne,
I hate to beat a dead horse ......
All due respect here but, am I missing something ?
Yes, Dr. Irving is one of our most brilliant Scientist's we all know that but, he is not the only one. I repeat. Dr. jambon says it' so. So it's so.
Sorry.
Solong.
Carl
--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax
---- Impactika at aol.com wrote:
> Carl,
>
> Yes, I read your email.
>
> Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional
> I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results
> of the O-Isotopes comparison.
>
> Anne M. Black
> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
> _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com)
> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
>
>
> In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
> cdtucson at cox.net writes:
> Anne,
> Perhaps you did not read my last post (same thread) because I posted an
> email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his
> original classification have been made and
> In his email he clearly states "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA
> 5363!".
> This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has
> past.
> We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and
> Science publications. already have this information.
> Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news.
> Carl
> --
> Carl or Debbie Esparza
> Meteoritemax
>
>
> ---- Impactika at aol.com wrote:
> > Kai,
> >
> > This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again.
> >
> > The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites
> are
> > paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes
> is
> > done on both meteorites.
> > It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400.
> > He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363.
> > And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one.
> >
> > Patiently if at all possible!
> >
> > Anne M. Black
> > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
> > _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com)
> > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
> > torontokai at gmail.com writes:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired.
> > But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its
> > terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a
> > brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot
> > find the 5363 on meteotitical bulletin.
> >
> > Just post my thinking for your consideration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kai
>
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list