[meteorite-list] NWA 5363 UNGROUPED OR BRACHNITE

[Impactika at aol.com]

Carl,
 
Yes, I read your email.
 
Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional
I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results 
of the O-Isotopes comparison.
 
Anne M. Black
_http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) 
_IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com) 
Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
_http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) 
 
 
In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
cdtucson at cox.net writes:
Anne,
Perhaps you did not read my last post  (same thread) because I posted an 
email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his 
original classification have been made and 
In his email he clearly states   "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA 
5363!".
This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has  
past. 
We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and 
Science publications. already have this information. 
Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news.
Carl
--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax


---- Impactika at aol.com wrote: 
> Kai, 
>  
> This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again.
>  
> The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites 
are 
> paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes 
is 
> done on both meteorites.
> It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400.
> He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363.
> And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one.
>  
> Patiently if at all possible!
>  
> Anne M. Black
> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) 
> _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com) 
> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) 
>  
>  
> In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
> torontokai at gmail.com writes:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired.
> But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its
> terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a
> brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot
> find the  5363 on meteotitical bulletin.
> 
> Just post my thinking for your consideration.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kai