[meteorite-list] Dr. Bunch's Latest on NWA 1839/3133

[Adam Hupe]

My last post on the subject,

I just had a lengthy conversation with Dr. Bunch just as few minutes ago 
about the non-paired stones NWA 1839/3133.

Some statements made by Dr. Bunch:

He absolutely and unequivocally disagrees with David Weir's last post the 
List.

He has access to the latest data and it in no way supports a pairing between 
the two.

Dr Bunch's exact quote "The petrography, mineral chemistry and oxygen 
isotopes clearly indicate that NWA 1839 and NWA 3133 are NOT paired, period! 
bingo!"

I don't think it could be stated much clearer than that,

Adam







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Weir" <dgweir at earthlink.net>
To: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites at comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days


> Adam Hupe wrote:
>> Stan,
>>
>> Let it go, you are absolutely wrong, again.  Like I told David Weir, 
>> contact Dr. Bunch yourself about NWA 3133 and report back to the List 
>> your findings. Read the archives, it is all in there.
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> Thanks for inviting me into your debate. All I have to say is that I am 
> 100% convinced that 3133 IS paired to 1839. This data IS NOT contained in 
> the List archives, but I have a copy of it. Dr. Bunch has already been 
> contacted and supplied this new data. Although he claims only to be a 
> messenger, he has graciously taken it upon himself to arrange for new 
> isotopic tests to be performed in light of this new irrefutable data (my 
> words not his). If you are patient you will eventually know that these 
> stones are paired. I will not supply you with my forensic data at least 
> until you supply the List with yours, that which supports the hypothesis 
> against such a pairing. Have a great day, I need to cook dinner.
>
> David
> meteoritestudies.com
>