[Scons-dev] bug prune

Dirk Bächle tshortik at gmx.de
Sat Aug 31 08:08:48 EDT 2019


Hi,

this approach sounds good to me too. I just wanted to mention that I have all the old Tigris Issues (and user and developer mails)
archived on my local machine. They're stored in a simple text-ish format that can be read into corresponding Python classes.
My plan is still to write a small "viewer" app, that would enable interested developers/users to "browse" through the "SCons
archives". In my view there is a lot of hidden knowledge in there, that we can't really use at the moment.

I'll try to check whether my "archive" is still up-to-date during the next days. ;)

Best regards,

Dirk

On 27.08.19 15:53, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
> I think this would be great. I'll help review the bugs-to-be-closed.
>
> -- Gary
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:50 AM Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us <mailto:mats at wichmann.us>> wrote:
>
>
>     Just to pull some thoughts together:
>
>     there are currently 679 open scons issues on github.
>
>     That number drops to 92 if you select only ones which have had a
>     modification since the big migration from tigris. Try this query:
>
>     is:issue is:open updated:>=2018-02-10
>
>     or as a link:
>
>     https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+updated%3A%3E%3D2018-02-10+
>
>     I'm a relative newcomer around here, but I don't see the value of
>     showing a ton of historical bugs that aren't being worked on; the newly
>     filed ones don't even get a lot of attention - there just isn't a big
>     scons team at this point and numerically most current contributors have
>     a specific motivation ("itch to scratch" as it were) rather than the
>     ability to just generally work on bugs.  To provide more visible focus
>     there's already been some discussion of a bug prune.
>
>     My suggestion is this:
>
>     (a) close all open tigris bugs with a message that includes these items:
>
>     * bug is now tracked on github [link]
>     * bugs which have not had activity in 18 months are going to be closed
>     (it doesn't have to be 18, but that was the cutover time)
>     * we understand readers of this issue might not see messages from
>     github, so if you want to keep this issue alive, make a comment - any
>     comment - on the corresponding github issue.
>
>     (b) fire up a bot to mark inactive github issues with a tag, and
>     configure suitably.  Looks like there's an app in the github marketplace
>     that is free so setup is just a YAML file. Example setup here:
>
>     https://github.com/timgrossmann/InstaPy/commit/afd968dfa1ce1141456a207484d35f2766d5916b
>
>     the app:
>
>     https://github.com/marketplace/stale
>
>     (c) someone scan through the first-time closure proposal list and
>     manually update any which seem deserving of continued life.
>
>
>     Closed-as-stale issues don't vanish, they are still there to be browsed
>     as needed...
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Scons-dev mailing list
>     Scons-dev at scons.org <mailto:Scons-dev at scons.org>
>     https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Gary
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>



More information about the Scons-dev mailing list