[Scons-dev] Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github
Daniel Moody
dmoody256 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 20 10:49:17 EST 2017
Yeah, there is to much room for error with floats lining up to the indices
for the desired tests. It should take in the test indices I guess, the only
drawback being you need to know/calculate the indices before hand.
--interval-start INT index in the list of tests to start testing
from
--interval-end INT index in the list of tests to end testing at
This is more error proof I think.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:
> Sounds good. Just need to ensure that splitting in quarters doesn't either
> drop one or run one test twice because of rounding..
>
> -Bill
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about this:
>>
>> --interval-start FLOAT Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what
>> test to start on from the
>> determined list of all tests
>> --interval-end FLOAT Percentile as float (0.0 - 1.0) of what
>> test to start on from the
>> determined list of all tests
>>
>> interval-start default is 0
>> interval-end default is 1
>>
>> A little more flexible I think.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe add a flag directly to runtest.py to split up the tests.
>>> --test_mod 4 --test_index 0..3 ?
>>>
>>> Or something to that affect.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> I also was working on this. I think in your case the builds timed out
>>>> due to issues with vswhere:
>>>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/87
>>>> https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/issues/91
>>>>
>>>> In this case we will need to use the Visual Studio 2017 image.
>>>>
>>>> Also just to note; the issue mentioned above is also an issue with
>>>> SCons MSVS detection in general now for SCons 3 and newer since that is
>>>> when it was switched to use vswhere.
>>>>
>>>> I liked some of the things you had in your script so I took those and
>>>> merge them into my script. I also implemented a script that will split the
>>>> build up into multiple jobs like the travis script does, however I have not
>>>> been able to get appveyor to do multi-line scripts correctly so it is all
>>>> in a one liner at the moment:
>>>> https://github.com/dmoody256/scons/blob/AppveyorCI/.appveyor.yml
>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dmoody256/scons/build/1.0.53
>>>>
>>>> Currently python 3 will fail from several tests so I have them
>>>> commented out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Parallel should help.
>>>>>
>>>>> On my buildbot worker (with 2 other builds running single threaded
>>>>> tests) it takes 2:05.
>>>>> So on a reasonably modern machine, -j2 should finish in under an hour
>>>>> if not, try -j3?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or we can split up runs as we've done with the travis run..
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Featherstone <
>>>>> andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been trying to get AppVeyor working for Windows-based CI, but
>>>>>> we're hitting their 1 hour time limit (see
>>>>>> https://github.com/ajf58/scons/blob/appveyor/.appveyor.yml and
>>>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ajf58/scons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My next pass at this will be trying to run the unit tests in parallel
>>>>>> (as the Windows VM has two cores available). Either that, or we split the
>>>>>> job matrix a different way, e.g. run tests grouped by something else other
>>>>>> than Python version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18 December 2017 at 22:51, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we get travis to test with py2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> That's pretty cool.
>>>>>>>> I'll try to get the coverage hooked up soon.
>>>>>>>> That'll also be very useful..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jonathon Reinhart <
>>>>>>>> jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, it should automatically do that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See this (merged) PR from one of my projects:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/JonathonReinhart/scuba/pull/98
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Towards the bottom you'll see a "View Details" button.
>>>>>>>>> Clicking that will expand a box showing the results of all the
>>>>>>>>> "checks" that ran.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Bill Deegan <
>>>>>>>>> bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to get travis to post the results back into the
>>>>>>>>>> pull request?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20171220/7555051d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Scons-dev
mailing list