[Scons-dev] Slots ready to release?

[William Blevins]

I'm not sure what I am talking about either.  I think I got email chains
mixed up...

I don't see any reasons not to do 2.4.0 with slots.

V/R,
William

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> William,
>
> I'm not sure what you are talking about?
> My question was just weather the dev list folks thought there was any
> reason to hold off releasing default which has the slots changes in it.
>
> There's no plan or mention of your changes in the email..
> -Bill
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:57 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I see releasing cross language support separately as less risk.  If there
>> are issues, then they can be more easily associated with the correct change
>> sets.  We still haven't made an email announcement either.  I don't expect
>> problems, but I find being the pessimist wins battles by simply not having
>> to fight them.
>>
>> The only reason I could see for not doing them separately is because of
>> the release overhead, and that is outside my pay grade ;)
>>
>> V/R,
>> William
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Any reasons not to push out 2.4.0 with the slots changes?
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev at scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20150912/2d5357af/attachment.html>