[Scons-dev] That was easy…

Jason Kenny dragon512 at live.com
Sat Dec 26 21:13:12 EST 2015


+1

Sent from my Windows Phone

-----Original Message-----
From: "Bill Deegan" <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
Sent: ‎12/‎26/‎2015 7:00 PM
To: "SCons developer list" <scons-dev at scons.org>
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] That was easy…

If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred method of installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not have to "Vendorize" them.



On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>
[…]
>
> I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a 
> requirement for using scons.
>
> In my case, I was using lineprofiler.  It does something strange
> with 
> builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working
> after 
> future was installed was hard to find.

So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize
and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no
future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite
a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6.


--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder



_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev at scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list