[Scons-dev] That was easy…

[Tim Jenness]

> On Dec 25, 2015, at 10:26 , Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tim Jenness wrote:
>> 
>> I’m not really sure what you mean. future package doesn’t have any
>> dependencies as far as I can tell from the requirements.txt in the
>> package. There are some additional dependencies if you need the code to
>> work on python 2.6 but that’s not an issue here.
>> 
>> futurize -1 doesn’t inject dependencies into the code base itself.
>> 
>> —
> Haven't tried futurize with '-1', but I meant that if you pip install future 
> it installs many entries into site-packages, in a very intrusive manner.  If 
> you pip install future, it puts not only future and past into site-packages, 
> but such goodies as builtins, and many more.  The builtins caused me 
> conflicts which were very difficult to track down.
> 

builtins is meant to be a no-op on python3. It replaces python2 builtins with implementations that match the python3 spec (such as returning iterators instead of lists; and making strings look like python3 unicode).

— 
Tim Jenness


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20151225/05f2cdd0/attachment.html>