[Scons-dev] Question...(not flamebait)

[Bill Deegan]

Dirk,

Yes I agree. Low importance task.

-Bill


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:


> On 03.03.2014 20:37, Bill Deegan wrote:

>

>> Anatoly,

>>

>> This is a bikeshed'ing type discussion.

>> So we'll never agree on this.

>>

>> The project has long had the emacs/vim info in each source file, so

>> there's no reason to change.

>> That said, some automated checking in buildbot might not be a bad idea.

>>

>> Though I'd put money that SCons source code (haveing long preceded PEP8

>> rules) won't conform (at present) to PEP 8.

>>

>> It might be worthwhile to get there though as such automated checking

>> would get easier.

>>

>> Other opinions on PEP-8 formatting compliance?

>>

>

> I, personally, don't feel like I would write better code (or more code)

> with it. And as a user I don't care how the SCons sources look, as long as

> it's doing what I expect from it.

>

> Let's all together try to get Python3-compliant instead... ;)

>

> Regards,

>

> Dirk

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140303/13638d7a/attachment.html>