[Scons-dev] Question...(not flamebait)

[Gary Oberbrunner]

I think Anatoly's right -- at least we haven't required contributor
assignments from anyone before.


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:48 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>wrote:


> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>

> wrote:

> > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 06:05 -0500, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:

> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk>

> wrote:

> >>

> >> > In SCons' case the situation is easy, the assigned or

> >> > shared copyright should rest with the SCons Foundation, and it should

> be

> >> > the foundation that is the published copyright owner.

> >> >

> >>

> >> Yes, this is correct.

> >

> > Has everyone with contribution in the SCons codebase signed a copyright

> > transfer, copyright share agreement, or a collaboration agreement

> > covering these things? Who handles this on behalf of the SCons

> > Foundation?

> >

> > I guess I need to sign one if I am about to send in a pull request.

>

> You don't need copyright assignment. It is only needed if SCons foundation

> decides to change the license. So, if you ok with it being MIT licensed and

> don't want to sue any of us, just submit your pull request. Otherwise, you

> will need of course to sign an agreement.

> --

> anatoly t.

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>




-- 
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140303/db982f6b/attachment.html>