[Scons-dev] Is Tigris issue tracking actively used?

[anatoly techtonik]

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 07.07.2014 22:01, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Andrew Featherstone
>> <andrew.featherstone at cantab.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I was wondering what the current state of issue tracking is for the SCons
>>> project. There was some talk a little while back about moving away from
>>> Tigris to a different issue tracker, has that happened?
>>
>> No. Sorry. Dirk made script to export tigris.org issues, which I saved
>> here:
>> https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/dataliberation/src/tip/issues/?at=default
>> but Google deprecated their Issue API, probably due a lot of spam:
>> https://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/IssueTrackerAPIPython
>> Bitbucket supports import/export, but was considered awful by me:
>>
>> https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/BITBUCKET/Export+or+import+issue+data
>> and then I stuck with reversing Roundup tracker model.
>
>
> Moving to Roundup as bug tracker got discussed recently on the dev ML:
>
>   http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/2014-May/001369.html
>
> I have patched the export scripts from the dataliberation repo above, and am
> able to export most of the current Tigris tracker's info to a Roundup
> instance.
>
> I also have two final pull requests pending at OpenHatch:
>
>   https://github.com/openhatch/oh-bugimporters/pull/57
>   https://github.com/openhatch/oh-mainline/pull/293
>
> which will make our database available (read-only) via their Roundup
> tracker.

Nice. I added incremental download to dataliberation project and will
to see how to convert stuff with OpenRefine.

-- 
anatoly t.