[Scons-dev] Duplicate issue policy

[Russel Winder]

On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 12:15 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote:
> On 10.08.2014 11:02, Russel Winder wrote:
> > I am wondering if it should be policy for later duplicates to be marked
> > as duplicates of earlier issues, rather than earlier issues being marked
> > as duplicates of later ones?
> >
> I've seen earlier duplicates that had the better information, or 
> additional patches/testcases attached. In those cases, I always chose to 
> mark the "later" issue as duplicate of the first...I'd really like to 
> continue making this decision based on information, not on modification 
> dates.

OK works for me.  Whatever works for the people actually doing things
rather than pontificating on them :-)

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20140810/e7cb2a53/attachment.pgp>