[Scons-dev] plan for python3 port?

William Deegan bill at baddogconsulting.com
Thu Sep 5 16:15:23 EDT 2013


Jason,

Yes. But currently it's a bit broken as it doesn't seem to pick up new changes.
Hopefully I'll get that resolved soon.
Of course we need to have build slaves with the appropriate versions of python installed.

-Bill
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:17 AM, "Kenny, Jason L" <jason.l.kenny at intel.com> wrote:


> I think that can be done.. but there are places in which there are big fixes in libraries ( such as subprocess) that will require careful coding. Is the current BB testing setup to support testing with more than one version Python?

>

> Jason

>

> From: scons-dev-bounces at scons.org [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Gary Oberbrunner

> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:12 AM

> To: SCons developer list

> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] plan for python3 port?

>

> I thought people said there were issues with 2.6 that prevented the same code working in 3.x. But indeed there's still a lot of python2.6 out there; if we could support 2.6, 2.7 and 3.x (x>=3) that would be a superb outcome.

>

>

> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:12 +0000, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote:

> > Those of us who aren't so active and are still on python 2.6 are going to be less happy, especially if we aren't entirely in control of which version of python we get to use.

>

> << I thought I had replied to this, but cannot see it. If an earlier

> version turns up, sorry for the duplication. >>

>

> RHEL appears determined to stay with Python 2.6 and I guess many other

> have to as well. I was originally for the 2.7 floor to get at all the

> backports of 3.3 stuff as and when. However if there are many SCons

> users in need of executing on 2.6, and now that we know many projects

> who are being Python 2 and Python 3 compliant are choosing 2.6, 2.7 and

> 3.3+ as their compliance list and succeeding (*), I wonder if SCons

> should revert the 2.7 floor decision and consider a 2.6 floor decision.

>

>

> (*) 2,5 and earlier are ignored as are 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2.

>

> --

> Russel.

> =============================================================================

> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net

> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk

> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>

>

>

>

> --

> Gary

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20130905/2a5b2583/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-dev mailing list