[Scons-dev] Qt support

[Brady Johnson]

I like Bill's approach, 2 thumbs up from me :)

Brady



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de> wrote:


> Hi Bill,

>

>

> On 15.04.2013 04:11, Bill Deegan wrote:

>

>>

>> Greetings,

>>

>> SCons has always been (as much as possible) a batteries include tool.

>> For me personally, and also from many questions on the mailing list and

>> IRC, having mainstream tools not in the core confuses users. I consider QT

>> to be a mainstream tool..

>>

>> I'd suggest the following:

>> 1) deprecate qt, rename it qt3

>> 2) integrate qt4 and qt5 into the core.

>>

>> Thoughts? I know I'm disagreeing with others, hopefully this isn't just

>> bike sheding (Please call me on it if it is).

>>

>>

> everything you say above makes sense to me. I don't need the Qt tools in

> the core, but I don't need them external either. All I'd like to see is a

> clear direction in which we are going, and you're offering one.

> I'm a 100% for doing it like this, if no objections from other people show

> up.

>

>

>  That said, I think it would be a great idea to add non-mainstream tools

>> as python packages distributed via pypi which would install into the core

>> or in such a way that the core would find them.

>>

>>

> I agree.

>

> Regards,

>

>

> Dirk

>

> ______________________________**_________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/**mailman/listinfo/scons-dev<http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://two.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-dev/attachments/20130415/7665dfea/attachment.htm>