[Scons-dev] debugging signatures

[William Deegan]

Tom,

If order of your sources is important then it's important to store it in the signature.
If not, then it probably isn't.

-Bill
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <ttanner2 at bloomberg.net> wrote:


> So if you ${SOURCES} the names of all the sources go in the signature calculation? even though they're already dependencies anyway? So I should really do $( ${SOURCES} $) in my situation?

> 

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: garyo at oberbrunner.com

> To: TOM TANNER (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), scons-dev at scons.org

> At: Sep 21 2012 13:11:18

> 

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)

> <ttanner2 at bloomberg.net> wrote:

>> But thats referring to $( $) not ${ $}. I think it'd be wrong to put the sources in the signature calculation as they are probably already in the dependencies, but I don't know if it does or doesn't

> 

> Bill's right.  ${...$} does variable substitution, just like $FOO.

> The result of that substitution goes into the signature.  Everything

> except what's in $(...$) goes in.

> 

> -- 

> Gary

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev