[Scons-dev] [scons-release] 2.2.0 soon?

[Evan Driscoll]

Also, I can run short tests on other configurations -- 32-bit RHEL5, 
64-bit RHEL6, and, uh, SunOS 5.8 (not sure what Pythons are available 
there) -- though I can't set up a buildslave on those machines.

Should I just try to run the unit tests at some point?

Evan



On 07/30/2012 03:40 PM, Evan Driscoll wrote:

> On 07/29/2012 04:40 PM, William Deegan wrote:

>> Gary,

>>

>> Sounds good.

>> Also.. Let's put a call for buildslaves.. We have ubuntu& win7-64-vs2010.

>> If you have other machine configurations you care about and can loan

>> some cycles, please let me know.

>> It won't burn a ton of bandwidth or CPU on your machine.

>

> I might be able to run one on a 64-bit RHEL5 machine. (Maybe RHEL6

> sometime soonish? Ooo, I hope.) I can run different versions of python

> too if it's easy to set up (e.g. start the buildbot with a different

> PATH). (I have at least: 2.4.1, 2.4.3], 2.5.2, 2.6.2, 2.7.1, 2.7.2.)

>

> How would I set it up?

>

> Evan

>

>

>>

>> Thanks,

>> Bill

>> On Jul 29, 2012, at 7:42 AM, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:

>>

>>> We have a lot of little goodies now since 2.1.0. I have a few more

>>> little things I'd perhaps like to get in, like Intel v12 compiler

>>> support for Mac and Linux (I have a patch at work), but I think it's

>>> time. I've done a few test builds using the new release procedure I

>>> proposed a few weeks ago and things seem basically OK. (I didn't

>>> solve the win64 exe problem, but since that's not a regression I think

>>> we should just add some text on the website saying to use the zip

>>> method on win64.)

>>>

>>> Anyone have additional things they'd like to get in? Anyone have any

>>> issues that need to be addressed? Anyone think the new simplified

>>> release procedure needs to be revised? (See my mail of July 15th.)

>>>

>>> We could do a beta first, but since this is almost all bug fixes and

>>> an accumulation of small things I think we should just push it out as

>>> 2.2.0 final.

>>>

>>> If we can get the buildbot going again that would be an excellent

>>> test. But I don't think we should hold a minor release for that. In

>>> the meantime, please everyone download the latest default branch and

>>> make sure it works in your production environments (to the extent you

>>> can).

>>>

>>> If there are no showstoppers, I'd like to aim for next weekend. I'll

>>> do the builds and test runs and Bill, can you do the usual uploading

>>> and announcing?

>>>

>>> Comments?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Gary

>>>

>>> ------------------------------------------------------

>>> http://scons.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=7871&dsMessageId=2993692

>>>

>>>

>>> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to

>>> [release-unsubscribe at scons.tigris.org].

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Scons-dev mailing list

>> Scons-dev at scons.org

>> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>