[meteorite-list] Meteorite unclassified

[Michael Gilmer]

Maybe the peanut gallery clearly missed the word "UNCLASSIFIED" in the same
sentence. Or, this is a game of semantics.

If he had said - "Here is an unclassified meteorite that may possibly be a
CO type in my opinion", then would we still be having this discussion?

Given the obvious fact that English is a second language here and the
seller has a known good reputation, maybe he shouldn't be prosecuted over
the semantics of his post.

Weird flex about having meteorites that museums don't have. Whatever. LOL.

Just my two cents, actual worth may vary.


On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:32 AM Rhett Bourland via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Educated guesses aren't classifications.  Nobody can do that.  I've got
> close to a couple hundred pieces in my collection that I've built up over
> the past 25 years.  I own classes of meteorites that most museums don't
> even have because the museums that I got them from told me where the other
> pieces were.  I can safely say that I have handled and seen even more in
> that time.  The IMCA got started in my living room. I wouldn't even call
> something a meteorite unless it got tested.  As Anne Black recently said,
> people guessing what they have and presenting it as such is nothing but
> harmful for the science and commercial trade of these rocks and that woman
> has seen and handled stuff that I can only dream of.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024, 3:37 PM <mendy.ouzillou at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Rhett,
>>
>>
>>
>> Our North African meteorite family has earned the right to make educated
>> guesses, especially after they have proven themselves to be reputable
>> dealers AND have examined the specimen. They have handled far more
>> meteorites than most dealers and collectors. There is no surprise that
>> they, and Mohamed in particular, can tell the difference between a CO and
>> another type of meteorite. Mohamed was fully transparent and clearly stated
>> that it is unclassified. There is nothing inauthentic about the posting.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no ulterior motive in responding to this post other than desiring
>> respectful discourse.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Mendy
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Meteorite-list <meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com> *On
>> Behalf Of *Rhett Bourland via Meteorite-list
>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 20, 2024 9:53 AM
>> *To:* Benzaki Mohamed <kemkemexpedition at gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Meteorite List <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite unclassified
>>
>>
>>
>> It's unclassified and yet you're calling it a CO?  That doesn't sound
>> very authentic to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 10:17 AM Benzaki Mohamed via Meteorite-list <
>> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all members hop have a good day.
>>
>>  Everyone interested will be interested by a largeste co carbonaceous
>> unclassified please contacte  me.all beste.
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240723/4fd2a097/attachment.htm>