[meteorite-list] Question re Ad: EXTRA RARE FALLS - Peekskill, New Concord, Barwell, Parnallee, and many more!

[Ruben Garcia]

Hi Steve,

I think you may have a point. However, in this case Michael is correct.

This is what happens when you're heading out the door for Tucson to
hand deliver meteorites and decide to quickly list some specimens on
eBay by using an old listing. It's usually done very quickly and can
be a great time saver - simply click on sell similar- and just change
the photos and the weight. In this case I didn't proof read the ad.

I just returned home and corrected the problem.



On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Steve Dunklee <steve.dunklee at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I believe nearly all meteorites in some way ar oriented , some more than
> others. What would be truly rare would be an unoriented meteorite with
> nearly all secondary or no fusion crust.
> cheersa
>  Steve
>
> From: Michael Blood <mlblood at cox.net>
> To: Ruben Garcia <rubengarcia85382 at gmail.com>; Meteorite List
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 6:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Question re Ad: EXTRA RARE FALLS - Peekskill,
> New Concord, Barwell, Parnallee, and many more!
>
> Hi Rubin,
>         Please allow me to express cicely that in bringing up this issue
> There is no personal criticism intended, whatsoever....the issue is
> Restricted entirely to the subject of the definition of "orientation."
>         Knowing you are a respected and accomplished member of the
> meteorite community and having concluded from personal interaction
> That your honesty and integrity are unquestionable I was very surprised
> to read your description of the NWA 859 specimen included, "oriented."
>         Please tell me what, exactly do you see that I am missing that
> Would make you describe this specimen (advertized below) as "oriented?"
>         I can only conclude one of two possibilities is at work: 1) I lack a
> complete understanding of what constitutes orientation or 2) there was an
> unintended error in composing the description. (perhaps there is a 3rd
> explanation?)
>         I see none of the aspects indicative of orientation - but I may be
> missing something? Perhaps the use of the term "oriented" was a clerical
> error? Perhaps there were photos showing aspects of orientation that did
> Not get posted with the ad?
>         RSVP
>         Thanks, Michael
>
>
> On 1/18/14 10:03 AM, "Ruben Garcia" <rubengarcia85382 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just listed - NO RESERVE AUCTIONS
>>
>>
>> http://www.ebay.com/sch/mr-meteorite/m.html?item=221356302301&pt=LH_DefaultDom
>> ain_0&hash=item3389dd1fdd&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
>>
>> FOR MORE  SERIOUS COLLECTORS
>>
>> (NOT ON EBAY) former Bob Haag Ensisheim, and large Peekskill, larger
>> New Concord, etc...
>> Email for photos and Prices
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com/
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>



-- 
Rock On!

Ruben Garcia
http://www.MrMeteorite.com