[meteorite-list] KATOL (L6) is official

[Jim Wooddell]

Some comments that have been made suggest no chondrules, yet there they 
are in the BSE images. Laurence does give their sizes in the write
up and they tend to be really small (200 - 700 um), but not really 
uncommon.  Because of their size, could that be why
some are missing them when they look at it and say no chondrules?

Jim


On 1/2/2014 9:10 AM, Carl Agee wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Given the wide range of lithologies we are hearing about, all I am
> saying it might be interesting to test the multiple lithologies and
> confirm what you are saying. I am not suggesting anything about
> multiple bodies or not, I don't have an opinion. I am simply
> describing how you could provide geochem evidence to form a well
> supported hypothesis. By the way, Laurence's BSE's on FB are
> unequivocal L6 -- nice equilibrated chondrules!
>
> Carl
> *************************************
> Carl B. Agee
> Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
> Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
> MSC03 2050
> University of New Mexico
> Albuquerque NM 87131-1126
>
> Tel: (505) 750-7172
> Fax: (505) 277-3577
> Email: agee at unm.edu
> http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6969 - Release Date: 01/02/14
>
>


-- 
Jim Wooddell
jim.wooddell at suddenlink.net
http://pages.suddenlink.net/chondrule/