[meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock

[Ed Deckert]

Nah.  It ain't dead until Art sings!

Ed  ;-)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Teague" <volgems at icx.net>
To: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock


> The horse is dead!  Long live the horse!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Mark Ford <mark.ford at southernscientific.co.uk>
>>Sent: Apr 11, 2014 4:52 AM
>>To: "Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com" 
>><Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
>>
>>Sorry that should read:  Phil and List,
>>
>>m.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com 
>>[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Mark 
>>Ford
>>Sent: 11 April 2014 09:51
>>To: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
>>
>>Chris and list,
>>
>>No need for personal attacks. - After all wasn't it your good self that 
>>said about 'dowsing' many years ago:
>>
>>>>"First off, let me say that all you naysaying dowser denialists need
>>>>to get off your high horses, come down from your ivory towers and
>>>>>enter the realm of simple, reproducible, empirical evidence-based
>>>>experimental scientific methodology ... >
>>
>>So where's the [scientific] evidence that the video is fake or not 
>>ake?  - Let's face it, it looks too good to be true BUT we just can't 
>>tell!
>>
>>
>>
>>m.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com 
>>[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Joshua 
>>Tree Earth & Space Museum
>>Sent: 10 April 2014 19:42
>>To: Meteorite list
>>Subject: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
>>
>>Chris,
>>
>>You need to install and tune up a bullshit detector. You seem awfully 
>>gullible. Plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis? Maybe to a 
>>moron.
>>
>>
>>Phil Whitmer
>>
>>Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum
>>
>>--------------------------------------------
>>
>>Then you need to tune up your analysis skills. And your knowledge of 
>>meteoritics. The video was not falsified, and is hardly "phony". What it 
>>shows is plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis. Many, perhaps 
>>most meteorite falls are not preceded by a significant fireball, and even 
>>fewer by acoustics of any sort.
>>
>>I don't hear many people saying there's a "reasonable chance" this could 
>>be a meteorite. I didn't even hear much of that early on. Only that 
>>nothing obviously excludes this from being a meteorite. That's a 
>>distinction well worth remembering. If this had been trivially rejected 
>>from the beginning, no analysis would have been performed, and that would 
>>be unfortunate.
>>
>>And that's getting real.
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list