[meteorite-list] WANTED: small unclassified type 3's

Michael Mulgrew mikestang at gmail.com
Fri Jun 7 20:27:43 EDT 2013


Thank you for the apology, William; you are a true gentleman.  While I
disagree that any debate on this matter is superfluous (my profession
requires me to be exact in my language), I am glad you successfully
acquired what you were after.

Michael in so. Cal.

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, William Feek <lunarmajor at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> To friend and foe alike,
> Besides the response from Mr. Mulgrew to my request, a number of you responded in the manner I was expecting, the result being I was successful at acquiring a few meteorites. It's that simple, I just wanted to get some meteorites, not invite a superfluous debate. Apparently a lot of people understood exactly what I intended for every single one of you that chose to send images, somehow you all managed to send nothing but images of exactly what I was looking for. So to those of you who responded accordingly and without the need to read anything more into my simple request, thank you very much, it was a pleasure to do business with you. This may come as a surprise after all I've said, but I do admit to having overreacted to Mr. Mulgrew's response, I amit I could just as easily have been diplomatic in expressing my dislike, I could also have chose to say nothing at all, so I do apologize for that not only to Mr. Mulgrew specifically, but also to everyone else on the list for was
>  ting their time with my unnecessary rant. I also want to give credit where credit is due, Mr. Mulgrew didn't respond to my rant, he could have retaliated, but he didn't, and I can applaud that.
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list