[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

[Michael Mulgrew]

Anyone can put anything on the internet and it doesn't make it true.
This new term only exists on one web page.  May it stay in quarantine
there.

Michael in so. Cal.

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Martin Altmann
<altmann at meteorite-martin.de> wrote:
> "they are not native to Earth."
>
> Ouch, Anne, cat-piano...
>
> Does that mean a paradigm shift in the IMCA rules?
>
> Really no offense intended,
> though at least the German collectors are waiting since last August for a
> definite clarification how to apply the "CoE" in that respect. Would be
> nice...
>
> "Unobserved fall",
> Please folks, don't make such a bugbear out of that, like it had happened
> with the so called "hammer falls"!
> I think, meteorites are already expensive enough....
>
> "Fallen find"
>
> Skol!
> Martin
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Anne
> Black
> Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Januar 2013 02:28
> An: hall at meteorhall.com; mike at meteoriteguy.com
> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com; valparint at aol.com
> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
>
> Every single meteorite ever found on Earth is necessarily the result of a
> fall, they are not native to Earth. The only difference is that some falls
> are seen, witnessed, and some, the vast majoriry, are not.
>
> So calling them Observed or Unobserved falls is logical. That is what
> happened to all of them.
> That is simple reality.
>
>
> Anne M. Black
> www.IMPACTIKA.com
> IMPACTIKA at aol.com
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list