[meteorite-list] Geological Survey of Canada fails to return piece of meteorite he discovered

[Galactic Stone & Ironworks]

Hi List,

Thanks Paul and Mike for the clarifications.  Sounds like a character.  LOL.

And, sales of all NASA-created fake replacement meteorites are hereby
suspended until further notice.   ;)

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-------------------------------------------------------------

On 2/11/13, Paul H. <inselberg at cox.net> wrote:
> In “Geological Survey of Canada fails to return piece of meteorite he
> discovered” at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com/msg110706.html
> MikeG wrote:
>
> “I am a bit confused here.  I didn't see the name of the meteorite
> mentioned in the article, only that it was found in the Yukon in
> 1986.  Is this an unclassified fall or find?”
>
> It is an unclassified find. According to the news articles, the
> Canadian Geological Survey geologists have determined that
> it is a meteorite.
>
> MikeG stated.
>
> “Also, a $1000 payout for a 243g meteorite works out to a mere
> $4/g - which is pretty good for a highly-weathered ordinary
> chondrite find. But a fresher, recent fall should fetch more than that.”
>
> According to the below article, that was the lower end of price
> range that Attorney General of Canada Office appraised it as
> noted in:
>
> Decade-long disagreement over meteorite back in court
> (A more than 10-year battle Daniel Sabo has had with the
> Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) continued Monday in
> the Yukon Court of Appeal.)  by Stephanie Waddell, Whitehorse
> Daily Star, November 6, 2012
> http://www.whitehorsestar.com/archive/story/decade-long-disagreement-over-meteorite-back-in-court/
>
> In this article, Mrs. Waddell wrote,
>
> “While Sabo has estimated the rock’s value at $12.1 million,
> Alexander Benitah, who’s representing the Attorney General
> of Canada in the case, pointed to estimates that had it come
> in between $1,000 and $2,500 based on the evidence of the
> GSC.
>
> He argued Sabo’s valuation is based solely on the highest-priced
> meteorite Sabo found on the Internet, while the $1,000 to $2,500
> is based on the evidence of the GSC.”
>
> Finally, MikeG stated.
>
> “Lastly, the guy sounds like some sort of conspiracy nut who
> claimed GSC switched out his meteorite and gave him an
> imposter in return. Then he demanded $12 million in damages,
> which was denied.”
>
> The below articles are rather revealing of the entire controversy
> and Daniel Sabo’s state of mind.
>
> 1. Meteorite conspiracy could be on the rocks by Tristin Hopper,
> Yukon news, September 12, 2008 http://yukon-news.com/news/9865/
>
> 2. A tale of two meteorites by Tristin Hopper Yukon News,
> July 18, 2008, http://www.yukon-news.com/sports/9552/
>
> For example, Mr. Sabo believes not only did the Canadian
> Geological Survey replaced his meteorite with a carefully sculpted
> replica made from another meteorite, but they also gave his
> original meteorite to NASA’s Johnson Space Laboratory. He
> also claims that the “fusion crust” on the specimen was faked
> using “aluminum — embedded with iron particles to simulate
> the magnetic properties of magnetite.”
>
> Yours,
>
> Paul H.
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>