[meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...

[meteoriteguy.com]

It didn't come from Mifflin. I bet $100 it is a chergach bought at Tucson in feb 2010 and sold to you as mifflin for a 1000% markup. 
Stop worrying about new find. Mifflin was very wet place. That stone is from Africa.
Michael Farmer


Sent from my iPhone

On May 8, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector at yahoo.com> wrote:

> That is some of the speculation that it may be a new find, or a planted find. Once I get some of the material returned, I am sending samples to be tested to try to help determine what it is and how long its been on Earth.
> 
> 
> Greg Catterton
> www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
> IMCA member 4682
> On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites
> On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites
> 
> 
> --- On Sun, 5/8/11, Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
>> From: Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...
>> To: "michael cottingham" <mikewren at gilanet.com>, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> Date: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 7:49 PM
>> Hello List and Michael C.
>> 
>> A huge compelling question is what the "fake" Mifflin
>> really is....Chergach and Bassikounou have been suggested,
>> or any popular H5 for that matter, and this relates to my
>> intermediate topic question I posted during this thread with
>> topic title "whole stone concerns" ...(I'm still interested
>> in a detailed perspective on that as well.)
>> 
>> Michael, 'twould be good to get the "fakes" analyzed asap,
>> but I bet you're already well on your way for an
>> answer.  How weird it would be to actually be a new
>> find?
>> 
>> Richard Montgomery
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "michael cottingham"
>> <mikewren at gilanet.com>
>> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 1:19 PM
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real
>> Mifflin Photos...
>> 
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> Since Jason posted his discovery, 2 more pieces of
>> "fake" Mifflin have been recovered. Taking into account cut
>> loss, I think I am almost certain that I have recovered 95%
>> of the stone that I was duped into buying.  I will not
>> be 100% certain until all of the pieces are returned to
>> me.  Even though, I have not been 100% refunded for my
>> purchase, I feel it is important to refund people's money
>> immediately or as fast as possible and to get this fake crap
>> off the market and into the trash can... or maybe into a
>> lawyer's hand!
>>> 
>>> PLEASE NOTE:  If you have any doubt about a
>> Mifflin specimen you obtained from me ...PLEASE send me a
>> photo so I can confirm one way or the other. Especially ,if
>> it does not look like anything in the Met Bulletin below.
>> Even if you did not get it from me, but just want a second
>> opinion... send me the photo.
>>> 
>>> Here is also a link to photos of Real Mifflin.
>> Everything posted in the Meteoritical Bulletin entry is
>> indeed REAL Mifflin.
>>> 
>>> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=52090
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best Wishes
>>> 
>>> Michael Cottingham
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> 
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list