[meteorite-list] Mani vs Arnold Verdicts

[meteorhntr at aol.com]

FYI: The plaintiff's legal bills were over $220,000 and my legal bills were over $250,000.  Add the court costs and time invested without any compensation to neither the plaintiff nor the defendant, this court case cost over $500,000.

Steve Arnold
Of Meteorite Men
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: meteorhntr at aol.com
Sender: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:06:38 
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Reply-To: meteorhntr at aol.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Mani vs Arnold Verdicts

To whom it may concern:

With the Honorable Judge Martha Tanner presiding over the 166th District Court, in Bexar County, Texas; a jury of 12 of my peers after a long trail returned the follow verdicts today:

Question 1,  Did Steven Arnold commit fraud against Brenham Meteorite, Ltd.?   
Jury's Answer:  No.

Question 2,  Did Steven Arnold commit fraud against Philip Mani?  

Jury's Answer:  No.

Question 3,  Did Steven Arnold fail to comply with his fiduciary duty to Brenham Meteorite, Ltd.?  

Jury's Answer:  No.

Question 4,  Did Steven Arnold fail to comply with his fiduciary duty to Philip Mani?   

Jury's Answer:  No.

Question 5,  Did Steven Arnold fail to comply with the partnership agreement?  

Jury's Answer:  No.

My wife Qynne and I would like to thank God for delivering this victory for us.

We are thankful to have this chapter of our lives behind us and we look forward to the exciting things ahead.

Steve Arnold
of Meteorite Men

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list