[meteorite-list] Mani vs Arnold Verdicts

[wahlperry at aol.com]

Hi Steve and Qynne,

Coagulations on the victory way to go!

Sonny


-----Original Message-----
From: meteorhntr <meteorhntr at aol.com>
To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Fri, Mar 18, 2011 8:06 am
Subject: [meteorite-list] Mani vs Arnold Verdicts


To whom it may concern:With the Honorable Judge Martha Tanner presiding 
over the 166th District Court, in Bexar County, Texas; a jury of 12 of 
my peers after a long trail returned the follow verdicts today:Question 
1,  Did Steven Arnold commit fraud against Brenham Meteorite, Ltd.?   
Jury's Answer:  No.Question 2,  Did Steven Arnold commit fraud against 
Philip Mani?  Jury's Answer:  No.Question 3,  Did Steven Arnold fail to 
comply with his fiduciary duty to Brenham Meteorite, Ltd.?  Jury's 
Answer:  No.Question 4,  Did Steven Arnold fail to comply with his 
fiduciary duty to Philip Mani?   Jury's Answer:  No.Question 5,  Did 
Steven Arnold fail to comply with the partnership agreement?  Jury's 
Answer:  No.My wife Qynne and I would like to thank God for delivering 
this victory for us.We are thankful to have this chapter of our lives 
behind us and we look forward to the exciting things ahead.Steve 
Arnoldof Meteorite MenSent from my Verizon Wireless 
BlackBerry______________________________________________Visit the 
Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.htmlMeteorite-list 
mailing 
listMeteorite-list at meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li
stinfo/meteorite-list