[meteorite-list] What's with these weird Campos?
MEM
mstreman53 at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 20 00:08:16 EST 2011
Be it remembered that it is not so much water but salt/chlorine that affects
stability. I imagine that the expansion differences in iron oxide and native
metal when placed in liquid nitrogen is an effective spalder for knocking off
the shale portions and carrying away the chlorine ions. It is likely they are
also treated with some petroleum sealer.
As to etching-- if the shards are in fact fracturing along taenite/kamacite
boundaries then there should be no Widmanstaten patterns.
Elton
----- Original Message ----
> From: Bob King <nightsky55 at gmail.com>
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 10:18:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What's with these weird Campos?
>
> Thanks everyone for all your replies. OK, so they appear to be blown
> up Campos. If true, they must have looked a lot more like shrapnel
> with sharp edges. It makes sense then, as Bob C. reported, that
> they're tumbled. If water's used in the tumbling process, I'm guessing
> these things will rust up quickly.
> Bob
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Meteorites USA <eric at meteoritesusa.com>
>wrote:
> > Yeah, I wonder if anyone's ever etched a Campo crystal before?
> >
> > Eric
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list