[meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Shawn Alan
photophlow at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 23 01:12:55 EDT 2010
Darren,
I would have to agree with you on that NWA 869 would have been a massive light show 4,400 years ago (Thank you everyone :) that answer my question) because it represents one of the largest finds in the Saharan desert. The total weight so far that has been recovered is about 7 metric tons which comes to about 15,432.3584 pounds. It is said that before entry, NWA 869 was about 120-230 metric tons, which means that 90% to 95% of the mass was lost due to ablation during atmopheric passage. That would have been a sight to see, sun glasses anyone?
Shawn Alan
[meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Darren Garrison cynapse at charter.net
Tue Mar 23 01:46:31 EDT 2010
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Next message: [meteorite-list] Fw: Re: Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
> terrestrial age is consistent with the low degree of weathering
>(W1). I am guessing 4.4 kyr means 4.4 years from the low level
BTW, if 869 had fallen just 4.4 years before it was found, there would be camels
that are still running today. The light show from that entry had to be MASSIVE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Next message: [meteorite-list] Fw: Re: Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list