[meteorite-list] Lovina "debate?"

[Matthias Bärmann]

What a frustration, Darryl, it would be if cosmogenic nuclide testing would 
turn out that Lovina is only part of a common spaceship from Beteigeutze.

My very best,
Matthias


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darryl Pitt" <darryl at dof3.com>
To: "Michael Blood" <mlblood at cox.net>
Cc: "Kevin Kichinka" <marsrox at gmail.com>; "Meteorite List" 
<meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Lovina "debate?"


>
>
> In response to Mike's query, Lovina revisited:
>
> LOVINA
> Iron (ataxite, ungrouped)
> Found 1981
> Bali, Indonesia
>
>
> --Lovina is highly anomalous, which in-and-of-itself plants a seed of 
> doubt;
> --Lovina was certified as a meteorite by the Nomenclature Committee;
> --An abstract on Lovina appeared in Lunar and Planetary Science;
> --John Wasson has stated "Metals made by man will differ from  meteorites 
> in terms of several elements and element ratios," and  declared Lovina is 
> most likely a meteorite as the elemental signature  of every single 
> element as well as every ratio between the elements  fit perfectly with a 
> meteorite's signature;
> --Ted Bunch declared this is most probably a meteorite, "The odds of a 
> terrestrial rock having every element and every elemental ratio match  a 
> meteorite's composition are akin to possessing a winning Powerball 
> ticket";
> --Lovina is currently undergoing cosmogenic nuclide testing;
> --If the radiation data comes back positive, Lovina is  incontrovertibly a 
> meteorite;
> --If the radiation data comes back negative, Lovina is probably a 
> meteorite but there will forever be a seed of doubt;
>
>
> For further information, go to http://www.macovich.com/Lovina.htm
>
>
> All best / Darryl
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Michael Blood wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin, Darryl & all,
>>        Can anyone tell me why there is ANY debate over whether
>> Or not Lovina is or is not a meteorite? It is listed in the Meteorite
>> Bulitin as a meteorite, so, what is this debate based on and
>> Who is arguing the issue?
>>        RSVP anyone who knows...
>>        Thanks, Michael
>>
>>
>> On 6/8/10 10:58 AM, "Kevin Kichinka" <marsrox at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I notice that a slice of Darryl's lovely Lovina met was recently
>>> offered at auction. Reading the prose associated with its  consignment,
>>> I wonder if clarification is in order.
>>>
>>> "In addition, Lovina is also one of a handful of underwater meteorite
>>> finds, and is the only meteorite find recovered from a body of water
>>> where there was not an additional meteorite from the same event first
>>> recovered from the shoreline."
>>>
>>> I lived in Florida for many years and have an interest in the few
>>> meteorites recovered there.
>>>
>>> According to the Cat of Mets 5th Edition - "Okechobee L4 (Palm Beach
>>> County, Florida) - Fragments weighing about 1kg were brought up in a
>>> net some 0.75 miles from the shore, G.P. Merrill (1916)."
>>>
>>> The body of water is Lake Okeechobee. There is no record of specimens
>>> ever having been recovered on shore.
>>>
>>> Kevin Kichinka
>>> MARSROX at gmail.com
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at 
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list