[meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King ofAngrites" for sale -...
Starsinthedirt at aol.com
Starsinthedirt at aol.com
Fri Jul 23 22:33:21 EDT 2010
Faith is the action of making your self accept some thing you know not to
be true. Other wise it is just learning.
How did we get on this nonsense again?
Tom
In a message dated 7/23/2010 8:22:53 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
geeg48 at msn.com writes:
Hi Eric,
I don't want to get drawn into another long debate, but I'd like to make a
couple of observations. You wrote:
"Funny, I never realized there was "proof" of what faith believes."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Eric, by definition, faith doesn't require proof, but often times
matters of faith have quite a bit of evidence (a type of proof) to support
them. I could give examples, but I would be wrong to bring them up on this
List, and if I did I would be chastised by most of the members here.
In your email, you not only accuse faith of not having any proofs, but you
also say that it is only made up of, "conjecture and subjective
interpretation of observation."
Well Eric, to be honest, I find that much of today's science, and the
science of the past, is also made up of much "conjecture and subjective
interpretation of observation." It's not supposed to be like this, but much of
science has a very religious feel to it. Science is supposed to examine
data, evidence and facts, and then follow that data, evidence, facts wherever
they may lead. Scientists are supposed to have completely open minds. They
are not supposed to have *any agendas*. Unfortunately, all too many
scientists do have agendas (presuppositions). They view the evidence through
their own biased lenses. They view the evidence through their own type of
"faith lense".
Mark wrote the following to you, "science has a lot more 'faith' to it
than most people realise!"
I agree with him, and I think Mark Twain would also agree with him.
With respect,
Greg Lindh
> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:00:40 -0700
> From: eric at meteoritesusa.com
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King
ofAngrites" for sale -...
>
> Funny, I never realized there was "proof" of what faith believes. Only
> conjecture and subjective interpretation of observation.
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 7/23/2010 12:52 AM, Mark Ford wrote:
>> Good quote.
>>
>> I also like:
>>
>> "Science is almost the same as faith, but just sometimes, once in a
>> while, the level of required proof is taken up a notch"
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
>> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of GREG
>> LINDH
>> Sent: 23 July 2010 04:31
>> To: gmhupe at htn.net
>> Cc: meteorite-list
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King
>> ofAngrites" for sale -...
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Greg,
>>
>> I've always loved science, but I do think that some in the scientific
>> community tend to stretch things a bit thin sometimes. All kinds of
>> theories about all kinds of things are thrown around with little to
>> support them. This reminds me of a quote by Mark Twain. The quote
>> follows:
>>
>> "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such
>> wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of
>> fact."
>>
>> Something to think about....
>>
>>
>> Greg Lindh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: gmhupe at htn.net
>>> To: DRose at emersonhosp.org
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:51:24 -0400
>>> CC: jgrossman at usgs.gov; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of
>>>
>> Angrites" for sale -...
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Isn't 'science' just that, "Science"... Ever evolving as ground truth
>>> comes in? Without open minds and hard work by many dedicated
>>> individuals, 'science' would not get very far, especially in the world
>>>
>>
>>> of meteortitics! Much of the initial work and/or thoughts are educated
>>>
>>
>>> suggestions which are meant to excite others in rational and sometimes
>>>
>>
>>> heated discussions, no matter what scientific focus is being
>>> discussed. I won't even bring up the evolution talks of the past...
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Greg Hupe
>>>
>>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 8:00 AM, "Rose, David MD"<DRose at emersonhosp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I agree with Jeff completely. Same thing happens in Medicine. And
>>>> even when the data is peer reviewed, that doesn't mean that it is
>>>> rock solid truth. It's a process of continual evaluation and
>>>> refinement.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-
>>>> list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Grossman
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:40 AM
>>>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of
>>>> Angrites" for sale -...
>>>>
>>>> Yikes! Abstracts to meetings are not peer reviewed!
>>>>
>>>> jeff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/21/2010 10:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jason and List,
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not refute Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer
>>>>> reviewed and
>>>>> contains several errors according to the classifying scientists. I
>>>>> asked
>>>>> scientists about the article and they stated, it is obvious that
>>>>> she didn't read
>>>>> the original peer reviewed abstract carefully, even mistaking the
>>>>> type of
>>>>> petrology that was discussed using formulas that simply do not
>>>>> apply to the
>>>>> texture NWA 2999 exhibits.
>>>>>
>>>>> There were several prestigious coauthors listed in the original
>>>>> paper; Unique
>>>>> Angrite NWA 2999: The Case For Samples From Mercury.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who am I to argue with the world's best? I will keep an open mind
>>>>> and hope for
>>>>> some ground truth that will hopefully settle it once and for all.
>>>>> I think the
>>>>> authors were making a point of having an open mind and that the
>>>>> subject should
>>>>> be debated possibly stimulated more scientific interest in
>>>>> Angrites. It took a
>>>>> long time to win over the scientific community that some of these
>>>>> meteorites
>>>>> were actually from Mars. It was debated to death and now nobody
>>>>> argues about
>>>>> the Shergottite parent body any more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>>>
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>
>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>>
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>
>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>>
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>
>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>>
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us. Email info at ssl.gb.com. You
should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor
disclose their contents to any other person.
>>
>> GENERAL STATEMENT:
>>
>> Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and
communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the
system and for other lawful purposes.
>>
>> Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15
0DP. Company No 1800317
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list