[meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of Angrites" for sale -...

[Adam Hupe]

Hi Jason and List,

I do not refute Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer reviewed and 
contains several errors according to the classifying scientists.  I asked 
scientists about the article and they stated, it is obvious that she didn't read 
the original peer reviewed abstract carefully, even mistaking the type of 
petrology that was discussed using formulas that simply do not apply to the 
texture NWA 2999 exhibits. 

There were several prestigious coauthors listed in the original paper; Unique 
Angrite NWA 2999: The Case For Samples From Mercury.

Who am I to argue with the world's best?  I will keep an open mind and hope for 
some ground truth that will hopefully settle it once and for all.  I think the 
authors were making a point of having an open mind and that the subject should 
be debated possibly stimulated more scientific interest in Angrites.  It took a 
long time to win over the scientific community that some of these meteorites 
were actually from Mars.  It was debated to death and now nobody argues about 
the Shergottite parent body any more.

Best Regards,

Adam