[meteorite-list] Murchison smells.....

Shawn Alan photophlow at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 16 23:13:13 EST 2010


Mike G and Listers,
 
Thats funny you asked if Murchison smells cause I have a Murchison fragment and it smells. At first I thought that the smell might be due to the foam but I am mistaken and the little sugarier rascal smells. If I am not mistaken, I think the Murchison has water in it and I wonder if the water has something to do with why the Murchison is able to retain its smell?
 
Shawn Alan 
 
 
 
 
Galactic Stone & Ironworks >meteoritemike at gmail.com 
Tue Feb 16 22:48:55 EST 2010 


Previous message: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 
Next message: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

Hi Folks! 

So it's true about the aroma of Murchison? I wish I had a piece big 
enough to smell without actually inhaling it. 

If I try to sniff my current Murchison, it will fly up my nose. LOL 

Best regards, 

MikeG 



On 2/16/10, Gary Fujihara <fujmon at mac.com> wrote: 

> Ha ha! I concur, and must confess that I too love the smell of 

> Murchison in the morning. 

> 

> Sent from Gary's iPhone 

> 

> On Feb 16, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Greg Redfern <gredfern at earthlink.net> 

> wrote: 

> 

>> My pristine Jim Strope 80g Murchison is kept under a bell jar. I 

>> LOVE the smell of all the aromatic compounds. Smells like a fine 

>> cognac. 

>> 

>> This meteorite is a joy to behold both visually and by inhaling ;-) 

>> 

>> Greg 

>> 

>> 

>> -----Original Message----- 

>>> From: Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector at yahoo.com> 

>>> Sent: Feb 16, 2010 6:01 PM 

>>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 

>>> 

>>> I have to agree, this has been an awesome discussion. 

>>> Murchison is one of my favorite samples in my collection. 

>>> When information comes out like this, it always adds something even 

>>> more special to it. 

>>> 

>>> Not an ad for me but, if anyone following this does not currently 

>>> have a sample, Gary has some really nice samples at very good 

>>> prices on ebay: 

>>> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZfujmonQQhtZ-1 

>>> 

>>> Its a must have for collectors, and this recent news just goes to 

>>> show that the study of this is ongoing. 

>>> 

>>> Any other links to information on this meteorite would be great! 

>>> 

>>> Greg Catterton 

>>> www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com 

>>> IMCA member 4682 

>>> On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites 

>>> 

>>> 

>>> --- On Tue, 2/16/10, Matthias Bärmann <majbaermann at web.de> wrote: 

>>> 

>>>> From: Matthias Bärmann <majbaermann at web.de> 

>>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 

>>>> To: Zelimir.Gabelica at uha.fr, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>>> Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 4:39 PM 

>>>> Hello Zelimir & Murchisionados, 

>>>> 

>>>> highly interesting indeed: thanks so much for informing us 

>>>> about your and your colleagues scientific work and giving us 

>>>> so the feeling of being privileged enough to sit in the very 

>>>> first row. 

>>>> 

>>>> If I understand your approach correct, your non-targeted 

>>>> focus of investigation leads directly to a highly diverse 

>>>> pattern. 

>>>> 

>>>> The last sentence of the abstract reads: "This molecular 

>>>> complexity, which provides hints on heteroatoms 

>>>> chronological assembly, suggests that the extraterrestrial 

>>>> chemodiversity is high compared to terrestrial relevant 

>>>> biological- and biogeochemical-driven chemical space." The 

>>>> high level of extraterrestrial chemodiversity vs. the less 

>>>> diverse terrestrial "chemical space" - could that mean that 

>>>> development of life could depend on a kind of reduction of 

>>>> diversity? Caused by selection (= "targetting"?)? Life would 

>>>> be essentially linked to a process of picking up elements 

>>>> out of the construction kit? But than it begins to play by 

>>>> combining them? Wouldn't that point to the necessity to make 

>>>> a strong distinction between diversity and complexity? Could 

>>>> that mean that the complexity of terrestrial biological and 

>>>> biochemical "space" is a result of reduction of (initial) 

>>>> diversity? 

>>>> 

>>>> Perhaps six (crazy) questions too much from a non-natural 

>>>> scientist ... 

>>>> 

>>>> Best regards, 

>>>> 

>>>> Matthias B. 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <Zelimir.Gabelica at uha.fr> 

>>>> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> 

>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:58 PM 

>>>> Subject: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> Darren, list, 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> The media info Darren is speaking about refers to the 

>>>> research we (a 

>>>> group of scientists) are being conducting since several 

>>>> months on 

>>>> Murchison, namely a non targeted analysis of its 

>>>> extraterrestrial 

>>>> organic contents. 

>>>> 

>>>> In a post I sent by end of last September, I had notified 

>>>> the list of 

>>>> that work by just mentioning the keywords "Murchison" and 

>>>> "organic 

>>>> contant". 

>>>> 

>>>> The paper, that was submitted for publication in due time 

>>>> (right in 

>>>> time for the 40th anniversary of Murchison fall), was just 

>>>> anounced 

>>>> released out of press a couple of hours ago. 

>>>> 

>>>> Here is the reference: PNAS, 107 (7), 2763 -2768 (2010). 

>>>> 

>>>> Abstract can be read here: 

>>>> 

>>>> http://www.pnas.org/content/107/7/2763 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> More discussions are available through various media press 

>>>> comments 

>>>> (easily found by Googling with keys: "Murchison, Phillippe 

>>>> Schmitt-Kopplin"). 

>>>> 

>>>> May I just insist that the incredible number of molecules 

>>>> we had found 

>>>> originated from the fact that the screening was not 

>>>> targeted. 

>>>> 

>>>> Also we never claimed that any of the hundreds of thousands 

>>>> of 

>>>> molecules we detected had a pre-biotic origin, something 

>>>> that seems to 

>>>> provoke debate in the media. 

>>>> Our work just shows there's no shortage of molecules on 

>>>> meteorites in 

>>>> general, and in Murchison, taken as reference in 

>>>> particular, that 

>>>> origin-of-life researchers could investigate... 

>>>> 

>>>> Those familtar with Ensisheim shows might remember that 

>>>> Philippe 

>>>> (Phil) was our new enthroned Ensisheim meteorite guardian 

>>>> in 2008. 

>>>> 

>>>> Phil is the head of the lab in Neuherberg (Munich) where 

>>>> all the 

>>>> measurements (combined FTICR-MS,NMR & GC) were run. 

>>>> We all, co-authors, are deeply indebted to him for his 

>>>> discern and 

>>>> faith in initiating that challenging research and for his 

>>>> expertise 

>>>> that caused its success beyond any of our initial 

>>>> expectations. 

>>>> 

>>>> So far we have recorded tons of other data on "many more" 

>>>> other 

>>>> meteorites. More exciting and weird results are coming 

>>>> continuously; 

>>>> thay will be published in the months to come. 

>>>> 

>>>> My best wishes, 

>>>> 

>>>> Zelimir 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> Shawn Alan <photophlow at yahoo.com> 

>>>> a écrit : 

>>>> 

>>>>> Darren and List 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Thank you for the read up on Murchison meteorite on 

>>>> how scientist have identified over 14,000 compounds 

>>>> and counting. While we are on the topic of Murchison 

>>>> meteorite, I came across an article on line that 

>>>> points out these interesting facts and finds on the 

>>>> Murchison as quoted from the article as follows.... 

>>>>> "Presolar grains are the oldest materials in the solar 

>>>> system," says Philipp Heck of the University of Chicago. 

>>>>> "The ages of the grains clearly indicate that they are 

>>>> older than the solar system." 

>>>>> But just how old? 

>>>>> Heck and his colleagues isolated 22 grains from the 

>>>> Murchison meteorite, which is well-known for the 

>>>>> organic material it contains, and measured how long 

>>>> the grains spent in interstellar space before winding 

>>>> up 

>>>>> in our nascent solar system. The implied grain ages, 

>>>> reported in a recent paper of the Astrophysical 

>>>> Journal, 

>>>>> appear to support a hypothesis that our solar system 

>>>> formed after a smaller satellite galaxy crashed into the 

>>>>> Milky Way around 6 billion years ago."...... 

>>>>> 

>>>>> "From the isotope abundances, the researchers estimate 

>>>> that the majority of grains spent between 3 

>>>>> and 200 million years in interstellar space before 

>>>> falling into our molecular cloud some 4.6 billion 

>>>>> years ago." 

>>>>> 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Here is the link to the article I found on line. 

>>>>> http://www.astrobio.net/pdffiles/news_3202.pdf 

>>>>> 

>>>>> and if your up for a read, here is an article on the 

>>>> age of presolar SiC grains found in Murchison 

>>>> meteorite. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> http://presolar.wustl.edu/ref/Gyngard09b.pdf 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Enjoy 

>>>>> Shawn Alan 

>>>>> 

>>>>> 

>>>>> 

>>>>> [meteorite-list] Murchison-- chock full o' stuffDarren 

>>>> Garrison cynapse at charter.net 

>>>>> Tue Feb 16 00:25:30 EST 2010 

>>>>> 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Previous message: [meteorite-list] West Texas 

>>>> Meteorite Hunt - February 15, 2009 

>>>>> Next message: [meteorite-list] West Texas Meteorite 

>>>> Hunt - February 15, 2009 

>>>>> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ 

>>>> author ] 

>>>>> 

>>>>> http://news.discovery.com/space/meteorite-crammed-with-millions-of-organic-compounds.html 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Meteorite Crammed with 'Millions' of Organic 

>>>> Compounds 

>>>>> 

>>>>> By Ian O'Neill | Mon Feb 15, 2010 04:52 PM ET 

>>>>> 

>>>>> A meteorite that hit the town of Murchison, Australia, 

>>>> hasn't quit giving up its 

>>>>> secrets. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> The Murchison meteorite is one of the most studied 

>>>> space rocks because many 

>>>>> pieces were recovered after it was seen breaking up as 

>>>> it fell through the 

>>>>> atmosphere in 1969. Approximately 100 kg of the 

>>>> carbonaceous chondrite was 

>>>>> recovered. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> Carbonaceous chondrites are extremely important to 

>>>> scientists as they were 

>>>>> formed from material that existed in the solar 

>>>> system's planet-forming disk of 

>>>>> gas and dust. They are, quite literally, time capsules 

>>>> holding onto a 4 billion 

>>>>> year old record of the birth of our solar system. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> In this case, the Murchison meteorite has given us 

>>>> another clue as to the 

>>>>> abundance of organic chemicals that existed before the 

>>>> Earth had formed. In 

>>>>> fact, this particular meteorite may have originated 

>>>> from material older than our 

>>>>> sun. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> "We are really excited. When I first studied it and 

>>>> saw the complexity I was so 

>>>>> amazed," said Dr Phillipe Schmitt-Kopplin, of the 

>>>> Institute for Ecological 

>>>>> Chemistry in Neuherberg, Germany. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> "Meteorites are like some kind of fossil. When you try 

>>>> to understand them you 

>>>>> are looking back in time." 

>>>>> 

>>>>> This new research made use of high resolution 

>>>> spectroscopic tools to identify 

>>>>> the various compounds inside. Although this meteorite 

>>>> has provided scientists 

>>>>> with vast amounts of information about specific 

>>>> carbon-based organics before, 

>>>>> this was the first non-targeted study. In other words, 

>>>> the researchers weren't 

>>>>> tracking down just one type of chemical, they did a 

>>>> broad analysis for all the 

>>>>> chemicals it might contain. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> And what they found came as a shock, it appears that 

>>>> the primordial solar system 

>>>>> probably had a higher chemical diversity than 

>>>> present-day Earth. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> In this study, 14,000 specific compounds including 70 

>>>> amino acids were 

>>>>> identified. But this number appears to be the tip of 

>>>> the iceberg; the meteorite 

>>>>> probably contains millions of different organic 

>>>> compounds. More detailed 

>>>>> analysis will now be carried out. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> But why is this important? To understand the diversity 

>>>> of organic chemicals that 

>>>>> were floating around a primordial solar system will 

>>>> help us understand how life 

>>>>> may have appeared on Earth. This particular chunk of 

>>>> carbonaceous chondrite 

>>>>> drifted through the gas and dust of the early solar 

>>>> system, collecting all the 

>>>>> basic organic chemistry from around that time, does 

>>>> that mean diverse organic 

>>>>> chemistry is the "norm" for proto-planetary star 

>>>> systems? 

>>>>> 

>>>>> These organic compounds are known to exist on comets, 

>>>> asteroids and other 

>>>>> planetary bodies, so what makes Earth the hothouse of 

>>>> life when everywhere else 

>>>>> seems to be lifeless? 

>>>>> 

>>>>> If organic chemistry is ubiquitous, perhaps planning 

>>>> to "seed" young star 

>>>>> systems with Earth-based life isn't such a good idea. 

>>>> The conditions for life 

>>>>> may not be that rare after all. 

>>>>> 

>>>>> ______________________________________________ 

>>>>> Visit the Archives at 

>>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list 

>>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

>>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> ______________________________________________ 

>>>> Visit the Archives at 

>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list 

>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

>>>> 

>>>> ______________________________________________ 

>>>> Visit the Archives at 

>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list 

>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

>>>> 

>>> 

>>> 

>>> 

>>> ______________________________________________ 

>>> Visit the Archives at 

>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

>>> Meteorite-list mailing list 

>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> ______________________________________________ 

>> Visit the Archives at 

>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

>> Meteorite-list mailing list 

>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

> ______________________________________________ 

> Visit the Archives at 

> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 

> Meteorite-list mailing list 

> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

> 



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
Mike Gilmer 
http://www.galactic-stone.com 
http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone 
------------------------------------------------------------ 





Previous message: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 
Next message: [meteorite-list] organics in Muchison..... 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list




More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list