[meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

[Shawn Alan]

Hello Listers,
 
The question with science is no science is bad science. Without the unimaginable, unthinkable, where would science be? 1492 a rock feel from the sky and to many it was a sign from GOD. But to us now this sign is Ensisheim meteorite. However, during the ages of doubt and disbelief of rock coming from space a select few push forth, Chladni, Howard, and Biot. They gave way to the science of meteoritics while others thought that these rock were mere objects ejected from volcanoes, windstorms, or lighting. It wasn’t until 1812 that science accepted that stones come from space and now we know it as meteorites today. Now this comes back to the question about science, why, and the answer is how come. In the coming months I do believe these new findings about arsenic based life will take science in a new perspective like how science took a new approach with meteoritic science. Again, the only bad science is no science. 


Shawn Alan
IMCA 1633
eBaystore
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html
 
 
 
[meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form
Mark Ford mark.ford at ssl.gb.com 
Wed Dec 8 04:54:03 EST 2010 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Next message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 




To be honest i'm not sure their paper is that much more flawed than many 
papers of this type are - after all the point of publishing a paper is 
simply to initiate discussion, encourage people to repeat the experiment 
and prompt for counter arguments. They can't answer all the questions in 
one paper. I think the mistake many people make is attach too much 
weight to one lonely science paper, rather, we should wait until others 
have repeated/refuted the claims. 


I think the problem comes from a PR point of view when they do 'world 
wide' announcements, that are over hyped up. They seemingly didn't learn 
from the Martian meteorite life one did they.. 

The danger of using the 'NASA' name to seemingly add creedance to a 
claim in this way, is at some point you are going to shoot yourself in 
the foot, and when (if) they do ever find real alien life, is any one 
going to believe it? 

Mark 




-----Original Message----- 
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com 
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of 
JoshuaTreeMuseum 
Sent: 08 December 2010 08:00 
To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 

What's up with the NASA junk science? First it's psuedo-fossils in 
meteorites, now a phony not-new life form. What's next, cold fusion? 
------------------------------ 
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. (SW) 

Phil Whitmer 





And, the blowback: 

http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2010/12/arsenic-associated-bacteria-nasas 
.html 

http://www.slate.com/id/2276919/ 

______________________________________________ 
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us. Email info at ssl.gb.com. You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their contents to any other person. 

GENERAL STATEMENT: 

Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. 

Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15 0DP. Company No 1800317 








Previous message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Next message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list