[meteorite-list] Neutron production in hypervelocity impacts - wasOdessa date

[Chris Peterson]

INTCAL98 defines the C14 calibration back 26,000 years. There have been 
subsequent calibrations using deposits in caves that push things back to 
about 45,000 years, with somewhat less accuracy, and these aren't normally 
used in standard C14 dating. What curve are you looking at that goes back 
50,000 years?

But it doesn't really matter. The problem is there is no way to connect 
changes in C14 levels with any kind of impact events. Barringer is not very 
accurately dated, and there was enough other stuff going on around the 
Younger Dryas to cause changes without invoking an impact. Note that I'm not 
saying here whether one or more impacts did or didn't occur over the C14 
data record, only that there is no solid, datable evidence that can be 
matched to that record. Given all the possible things that can affect C14 
production (and especially C14 uptake), it is almost impossible to use the 
record to demonstrate anything.

IMO Barringer is a horrible example in any case, if you believe that 
neutrons are produced. For such a small impact to actually produce enough 
neutrons to significantly affect the worldwide C14 levels would also result 
in very obvious radioisotope anomalies in the surviving iron meteorite 
samples, give iron's high neutron absorption cross section. You'd be better 
off trying to sell this theory with a collision with a comet or other stony 
body than an iron.

Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:44 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Neutron production in hypervelocity impacts - 
wasOdessa date


> Hi Chris-
>
> "The C14 calibration data only goes back 24,000 years,"
>
> Try 50,000 years - INCAL98.
>
> "and there have been no confirmed significant impacts during that time,"
>
> Barringer?
>
> "and not even any well dated minor impacts. So how can spikes in the 
> calibration curve be linked to impacts?"
>
> Actually, take a look at the INTCAL98 chart running back 50,000 YEARS. 
> Note the spike and then the bump at 10,900 BCE. This is what is started 
> driving Firestone - he saw a supernova at first, then a supernova 
> injecting comets.
>
> "Even given a large impact (a big given)"
>
> Take a look at Barringer, and look at what has been found at Sheriden 
> Cave, and by the way note the First Peoples' accounts of these multiple 
> large comet fragment impacts at:
> http://forum.palanth.com/index.php/topic,1093.0.html
>
> I suppose the denial will go on for years, even after the AGU 
> discussion/debates coming up soon.
>
> "there are plausible explanations for how this would affect C14 
> concentrations; far more plausible than the very unlikely production of 
> neutrons."
>
> Yes, I know the releases energies are very high, and yes, there are 
> multiple explanations, - sun, magnetosphere, supernova, etc. It will fall 
> to those with more intelligence than I myself have left to sort it all out
>
> But plese note that the one spike that got to me was the spike roughly at 
> the time of the Barringer Crater impact. Firestone is proposing multiple 
> supenovas, from what is being sent around, but it sure looks to me like 
> the energies in large hypervelocity impacts are indeed freeing neutrons.
>
> In the meantime, OSL dating for Odessa will be an open question for me.
>
> E.P. Grondine
> Man and Impact in the Americas
> (a pretty good book despite its flaws - write me off list for the 
> meteorite list special.)
>
> PS - I have been wrong in the past, and reserve the right to be wrong both 
> now and in the future.