[meteorite-list] Sikhote crust-chondrite / Could this be one of the rarest meteorites found?

wahlperry at aol.com wahlperry at aol.com
Wed Nov 18 19:45:42 EST 2009


Hi Jason and all,

Thanks for all the replies. From the sounds of things there is no way 
to tell what the rarest meteorite might be. This might not be the 
rarest meteorite, but my favorite is the Portales Valley that we found 
a couple years ago.

Thanks,
Sonny


-----Original Message-----
From: ensoramanda at ntlworld.com
To: Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; Jason Utas 
<meteoritekid at gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 3:43 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Sikhote crust-chondrite / Could this be 
one of the rarest meteorites found?


Hi Jason, All,Not classed as a silicated iron but...I have a nice end 
cut of Portales valley with about a 2:1 silicate, iron mix that shows 
an intriguing mix of fusion crusts flowing one into the other.Graham, 
UK---- Jason Utas <meteoritekid at gmail.com> wrote: > Carl, All,> Wow, 
thanks for that...hum.> Right - I think people are confusing rarity 
with desirability, market> value, and collector availability, when 
these are all really distinct> terms.> Right, it's all about O-isotopes 
now, but I'm not really sure why - it> seems to me that chemistry 
should be just as important...surely there> could have been parent 
bodies forming in the same general areas as> each other that were 
distinct bodies, but that, due to their relative> proximity, have 
similar or identical O-isotope values.  I don't know -> maybe that is 
how we group things...seems illogical to me, though.> > The trouble 
with "fusion crust..."> If I recall, a while back, Elton made some 
strange comments about a> fusion crust having to be composed of 
siliceous material and> impurities such as oxides etc.  He argued that, 
because the crust that> forms on irons lacks silicates, it is not a 
true fusion crust.> > The consensus of the list was that the crust that 
forms on irons may> be chemically distinct from the crust that forms on 
stones, but it is> for all intensive purposes analogous in pretty much 
every way to the> stony version, so we might as well call them the same 
thing.> > I think the reason we don't see much in the way of fusion 
crust on> silicated irons is because, well, there aren't many fresh 
silicated> irons around.  There are plenty of examples of crusted irons 
- and> with just over 50 iron falls, some of which are accessible to> 
collectors, well, they're there to be seen.  I don't know how many of> 
those ~50 iron falls are silicated, but I do know one thing - of all> 
of them, Udei Station's the only one that's available in any real> 
quantity, and I've never seen an example with good crust.  I don't> 
think that's because it didn't form a fusion crust - I just think that> 
such pieces aren't widely available, so they remain out of our field> 
of view, for the most part...> > Think of Estherville, things like 
that.  They're made of a pretty even> mix of iron and stone and they 
still form a fusion crust.> > I have a ~4.7g 1/2 end of Bencubbin that 
shows some pretty spectacular> warty fusion crust...I can get some 
pictures up if you'd like.  I> figure that's about 1/2 stone and metal 
as well, so...yeah.> > Regards,> Jason> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:26 
AM,  <cdtucson at cox.net> wrote:> > Jason, I would first like to say that 
if there were an award for most helpful and kind on this list you would 
be the winner.> > I truly believe you offer more good information than 
anyone else on this list. That says a lot because there are a ton of 
great people on this list. And I want to thank you for all you do. You 
are a tremendous person.> >> > I think you are 100% correct with this 
evaluation as you describe it. But, There is something to desirability 
/ Valuable in the formula of "rare".> > Just because something is rare 
does not mean it is desirable or valuable. To me rarely is irrelevant 
if not desirable. As you correctly point out. Who cares about your L6. 
So, to me the rarest meteorite that has those things has got to be the 
meteorite that every collector wants the most.> > That said it would be 
a subjective call but for me it would be ALH 84001.> > Lastly, Your 
reference to Jeff Grossman are correct but I notice that Oxygen 
isotopes rule in this biz. If the air matches , then that is where it 
is from and therefore that is what it is.> > A recent example of this 
is GRA 06128. They are calling it a brachinite based on Isotopes even 
though it is not related in  other ways to the brach clan. So, 
apparently the where it is from needs more specific categories like 
Mars now has four different categories.> > Anyway, I wanted to thank 
you for all your information. I know I had never seen actual fusion 
crust on any iron before yours. I have seen a lot of impostors but 
yours is truly the real deal.> > Has anyone ever studied that crust to 
determine what it is made up of? It seems from an earlier thread that 
the crust must be a mixture of the silicates within this meteorite. 
Because most other irons without silicates within them do not seem to 
leave a true fusion crust like your sikhote did? Thanks Carl> > --> > 
Carl or Debbie Esparza> > Meteoritemax> >> >> > ---- Jason Utas 
<meteoritekid at gmail.com> wrote:> >> Hello Sonny, All,> >> I've often 
thought about such a term - "the rarest meteorite."> >> The rarest 
meteorite would of course be smallest ungrouped meteorite,> >> for one 
could feasibly conceive of a 1-2g unique meteorite.  When a> >> new 
type is named, however, a hype generally surrounds it - rather> >> like 
the olivine diogenite craze of a few years ago, or the confusion> >> 
surrounding Bencubbinites, and other poorly defined types of> >> 
meteorites.> >> The simple fact of the matter is that there meteorites 
are too often> >> categorized by our current system into associations 
and groups into> >> which they fit rather poorly; Jeff Grossman states 
as much in the last> >> thread surrounding the poor chemical and 
isotopic relationships> >> between many basaltic meteorites deemed 
"eucrites."> >> But regardless of this fact, a simple truth remains. 
 There are> >> countless ungrouped meteorites and several 
Kakangari-type meteorites,> >> so while they may be one of the least 
common "types," they are by no> >> means examples of the "rarest" 
meteorite known.> >> Regards,> >> Jason> >>> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 
6:12 PM,  <wahlperry at aol.com> wrote:> >> > Hi Bernd and list,> >> >> >> 
 >  Would this be one of the rarest meteorites ever found? If not, what> 
 >> > meteorite would be?> >> >> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sonny> >> >> >> >> 
 >> > -----Original Message-----> >> > From: bernd.pauli at paulinet.de> >> 
 > To: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> >> > Sent: Tue, Nov 17, 2009 
1:12 pm> >> > Subject: [meteorite-list] Photo of a K-chondrite> >> >> 
 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Greg and List,> >> >> >> > 
Hardly any photos of Kakangaris exist. You'll find one on David> >> > 
Weir's excellent website: http://www.meteoritestudies.com/> >> >> >> > 
Click on chondrites and then scroll down to Kakangari!> >> >> >> > Thin 
section pics of Kakangari can be found here (on pages 202-205):> >> >> 
 >> > D.S. LAURETTA, M. KILLGORE (2005) A Color Atlas of Meteorites in 
Thin> >> > Section> >> > (Golden Retriever Publications and Southwest 
Meteorite Press, ISBN> >> > 0-9720472-1-2, 301 pp.).> >> >> >> >> >> > 
Best wishes,> >> >> >> > Bernd> >> >> >> > 
______________________________________________> >> > 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com> >> > Meteorite-list mailing list> >> > 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> >> > 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list> >> >> >> >> >> 
 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
______________________________________________> >> > 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com> >> > Meteorite-list mailing list> >> > 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> >> > 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list> >> >> >> 
______________________________________________> >> 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com> >> Meteorite-list mailing list> >> 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> >> 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list> >> 
______________________________________________> 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com> Meteorite-list mailing list> 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list______________________________________________http://www.meteoritecentral.comMeteorite-list 
mailing 
listMeteorite-list at meteoritecentral.comhttp://six.pairlist.net/mailman/li
stinfo/meteorite-list
  



More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list